15afe09bf4
Lin Ming reported a 10% OLTP regression against 2.6.27-rc4. The difference seems to come from different preemption agressiveness, which affects the cache footprint of the workload and its effective cache trashing. Aggresively preempt a task if its avg overlap is very small, this should avoid the task going to sleep and find it still running when we schedule back to it - saving a wakeup. Reported-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
15 lines
401 B
C
15 lines
401 B
C
SCHED_FEAT(NEW_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(NORMALIZED_SLEEPER, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_PREEMPT, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(START_DEBIT, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(AFFINE_WAKEUPS, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(SYNC_WAKEUPS, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(DOUBLE_TICK, 0)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(ASYM_GRAN, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(LB_BIAS, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(LB_WAKEUP_UPDATE, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(ASYM_EFF_LOAD, 1)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_OVERLAP, 1)
|