Sorts out the comments for processing steps 2,3 in section 8.5 of RFC 4340.
All comments have been updated against this document, and the reference to step
2 has been made consistent throughout the files.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Updates the references to spec documents throughout the code, taking into
account that
* the DCCP, CCID 2, and CCID 3 drafts all became RFCs in March this year
* RFC 1063 was obsoleted by RFC 1191
* draft-ietf-tcpimpl-pmtud-0x.txt was published as an Informational
RFC, RFC 2923 on 2000-09-22.
All references verified.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This will later be included in struct dccp_request_sock so that we can
have per connection feature negotiation state while in the 3way
handshake, when we clone the DCCP_ROLE_LISTEN socket (in
dccp_create_openreq_child) we'll just copy this state from
dreq_minisock to dccps_minisock.
Also the feature negotiation and option parsing code will mostly touch
dccps_minisock, which will simplify some stuff.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Renaming it to dccp_send_reset and moving it from the ipv4 specific
code to the core dccp code.
This fixes some bugs in IPV6 where timers would send v4 resets, etc.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
1. No need for ->ccid_init nor ->ccid_exit, this is what module_{init,exit}
does and anynways neither ccid2 nor ccid3 were using it.
2. Rename struct ccid to struct ccid_operations and introduce struct ccid
with a pointer to ccid_operations and rigth after it the rx or tx
private state.
3. Remove the pointer to the state of the half connections from struct
dccp_sock, now its derived thru ccid_priv() from the ccid pointer.
Now we also can implement the setsockopt for changing the CCID easily as
no ccid init routines can affect struct dccp_sock in any way that prevents
other CCIDs from working if a CCID switch operation is asked by apps.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The CCID should be notified of packet reception only when a packet is
valid. Therefore, the ACK vector needs to be processed before
notifying the CCID. Also, the CCID might need information provided by
the ACK vector.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bittau <a.bittau@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
If ACK vectors are used, each packet with an ACK should contain an ACK
vector. The only exception currently is response packets. It
probably is not a good idea to store ACK vector state before the
connection is completed (to help protect from syn floods).
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bittau <a.bittau@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When packets are received, the connection is either in DCCP_OPEN
[fast-path] or it isn't. If it's not [e.g. DCCP_PARTOPEN] upper
layers will perform sanity checks and parse options. If it is in
DCCP_OPEN, dccp_rcv_established() will do it. It is important not to
re-parse options in dccp_rcv_established() when it is not called from
the fast-path. Else, fore example, the ack vector will be added twice
and the CCID will see the packet twice.
The solution is to always enfore sanity checks from the upper layers.
When packets arrive in the fast-path, sanity checks will be performed
before calling dccp_rcv_established().
Note(acme): I rewrote the patch to achieve the same result but keeping
dccp_rcv_established with the previous semantics and having it split
into __dccp_rcv_established, that doesn't does do any sanity check,
code in state != DCCP_OPEN use this lighter version as they already do
the sanity checks.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bittau <a.bittau@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
As DCCP needs to be called in the same spots.
Now we have a member in inet_sock (is_icsk), set at sock creation time from
struct inet_protosw->flags (if INET_PROTOSW_ICSK is set, like for TCP and
DCCP) to see if a struct sock instance is a inet_connection_sock for places
like the ones in ip_sockglue.c (v4 and v6) where we previously were looking if
sk_type was SOCK_STREAM, that is insufficient because we now use the same code
for DCCP, that has sk_type SOCK_DCCP.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Basically exports a similar set of functions as the one exported by
the non-AF specific TCP code.
In the process moved some non-AF specific code from dccp_v4_connect to
dccp_connect_init and moved the checksum verification from
dccp_invalid_packet to dccp_v4_rcv, so as to use it in dccp_v6_rcv
too.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
And make the core DCCP code AF agnostic, just like TCP, now its time
to work on net/dccp/ipv6.c, we are close to the end!
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Noticed by Andrea Bittau, that provided a patch that was modified to
not transition from RESPOND to OPEN when receiving DATA packets.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Isolating it, that will be used when we introduce a CCID2 (TCP-Like)
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Moving the setting of DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_reset_code to the places
where events happen that trigger sending a RESET packet.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Eliciting a SYNCACK in response, we were handling SYNC packets
only in the DCCP_OPEN state, in dccp_rcv_established.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
It is possible to receive more than one CLOSEREQ packet if the
CLOSE packet sent in response is somehow lost, change the state
to DCCP_CLOSING only on the first CLOSEREQ packet received.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
To start the timestamps with 0.0ms, easing the integer maths in the CCIDs, this
probably will be reworked to use the to be introduced struct timeval_offset
infrastructure out of skb_get_timestamp, etc.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Tested with a patched netcat, no horror stories so far 8)
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
So that we retransmit CLOSE/CLOSEREQ packets till they elicit an
answer or we hit a timeout.
Most of the machinery uses TCP approaches, this code has to be
polished & audited, but this is better than we had before.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This is from a first audit, more eyeballs are more than welcome.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Also fix step 6 when receiving SYNC or SYNCACK packets, i.e. we were not using
the updated swl.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To avoid holding TIMEWAIT state for sockets in the LISTEN state.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Development to this point was done on a subversion repository at:
http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/dccp-2.6/
This repository will be kept at this site for the foreseable future,
so that interested parties can see the history of this code,
attributions, etc.
If I ever decide to take this offline I'll provide the full history at
some other suitable place.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
