2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
/* $Id: mmu_context.h,v 1.54 2002/02/09 19:49:31 davem Exp $ */
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __SPARC64_MMU_CONTEXT_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define __SPARC64_MMU_CONTEXT_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Derived heavily from Linus's Alpha/AXP ASN code... */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/system.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/spitfire.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern spinlock_t ctx_alloc_lock;
|
|
|
|
|
extern unsigned long tlb_context_cache;
|
|
|
|
|
extern unsigned long mmu_context_bmap[];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern void get_new_mmu_context(struct mm_struct *mm);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Initialize a new mmu context. This is invoked when a new
|
|
|
|
|
* address space instance (unique or shared) is instantiated.
|
|
|
|
|
* This just needs to set mm->context to an invalid context.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#define init_new_context(__tsk, __mm) \
|
2006-01-31 21:29:18 -05:00
|
|
|
({ unsigned long __pg = get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL); \
|
|
|
|
|
(__mm)->context.sparc64_ctx_val = 0UL; \
|
|
|
|
|
(__mm)->context.sparc64_tsb = \
|
|
|
|
|
(unsigned long *) __pg; \
|
|
|
|
|
(__pg ? 0 : -ENOMEM); \
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Destroy a dead context. This occurs when mmput drops the
|
|
|
|
|
* mm_users count to zero, the mmaps have been released, and
|
|
|
|
|
* all the page tables have been flushed. Our job is to destroy
|
|
|
|
|
* any remaining processor-specific state, and in the sparc64
|
|
|
|
|
* case this just means freeing up the mmu context ID held by
|
|
|
|
|
* this task if valid.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#define destroy_context(__mm) \
|
2006-01-31 21:29:18 -05:00
|
|
|
do { free_page((unsigned long)(__mm)->context.sparc64_tsb); \
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(&ctx_alloc_lock); \
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
if (CTX_VALID((__mm)->context)) { \
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long nr = CTX_NRBITS((__mm)->context); \
|
|
|
|
|
mmu_context_bmap[nr>>6] &= ~(1UL << (nr & 63)); \
|
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&ctx_alloc_lock); \
|
|
|
|
|
} while(0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006-01-31 21:29:18 -05:00
|
|
|
extern unsigned long tsb_context_switch(unsigned long pgd_pa, unsigned long *tsb);
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Set MMU context in the actual hardware. */
|
|
|
|
|
#define load_secondary_context(__mm) \
|
|
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__("stxa %0, [%1] %2\n\t" \
|
|
|
|
|
"flush %%g6" \
|
|
|
|
|
: /* No outputs */ \
|
|
|
|
|
: "r" (CTX_HWBITS((__mm)->context)), \
|
|
|
|
|
"r" (SECONDARY_CONTEXT), "i" (ASI_DMMU))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern void __flush_tlb_mm(unsigned long, unsigned long);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Switch the current MM context. */
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *old_mm, struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long ctx_valid;
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 17:09:01 -05:00
|
|
|
int cpu;
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 17:09:01 -05:00
|
|
|
/* Note: page_table_lock is used here to serialize switch_mm
|
|
|
|
|
* and activate_mm, and their calls to get_new_mmu_context.
|
|
|
|
|
* This use of page_table_lock is unrelated to its other uses.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 17:09:01 -05:00
|
|
|
ctx_valid = CTX_VALID(mm->context);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx_valid)
|
|
|
|
|
get_new_mmu_context(mm);
|
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx_valid || (old_mm != mm)) {
|
|
|
|
|
load_secondary_context(mm);
|
2006-01-31 21:29:18 -05:00
|
|
|
tsb_context_switch(__pa(mm->pgd),
|
|
|
|
|
mm->context.sparc64_tsb);
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 17:09:01 -05:00
|
|
|
/* Even if (mm == old_mm) we _must_ check
|
|
|
|
|
* the cpu_vm_mask. If we do not we could
|
|
|
|
|
* corrupt the TLB state because of how
|
|
|
|
|
* smp_flush_tlb_{page,range,mm} on sparc64
|
|
|
|
|
* and lazy tlb switches work. -DaveM
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx_valid || !cpu_isset(cpu, mm->cpu_vm_mask)) {
|
|
|
|
|
cpu_set(cpu, mm->cpu_vm_mask);
|
|
|
|
|
__flush_tlb_mm(CTX_HWBITS(mm->context),
|
|
|
|
|
SECONDARY_CONTEXT);
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define deactivate_mm(tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Activate a new MM instance for the current task. */
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void activate_mm(struct mm_struct *active_mm, struct mm_struct *mm)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int cpu;
|
|
|
|
|
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 17:09:01 -05:00
|
|
|
/* Note: page_table_lock is used here to serialize switch_mm
|
|
|
|
|
* and activate_mm, and their calls to get_new_mmu_context.
|
|
|
|
|
* This use of page_table_lock is unrelated to its other uses.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!CTX_VALID(mm->context))
|
|
|
|
|
get_new_mmu_context(mm);
|
|
|
|
|
cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
|
|
|
|
if (!cpu_isset(cpu, mm->cpu_vm_mask))
|
|
|
|
|
cpu_set(cpu, mm->cpu_vm_mask);
|
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
load_secondary_context(mm);
|
|
|
|
|
__flush_tlb_mm(CTX_HWBITS(mm->context), SECONDARY_CONTEXT);
|
2006-01-31 21:29:18 -05:00
|
|
|
tsb_context_switch(__pa(mm->pgd), mm->context.sparc64_tsb);
|
2005-04-16 18:20:36 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif /* !(__ASSEMBLY__) */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif /* !(__SPARC64_MMU_CONTEXT_H) */
|
