forked from Mirrors/freeswitch
165f180162
git-svn-id: http://svn.freeswitch.org/svn/freeswitch/trunk@3735 d0543943-73ff-0310-b7d9-9358b9ac24b2
425 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
425 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
# 2005 January 19
|
|
#
|
|
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
|
|
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
|
|
#
|
|
# May you do good and not evil.
|
|
# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
|
|
# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
|
|
#
|
|
#*************************************************************************
|
|
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library. The
|
|
# focus of this script is testing correlated subqueries
|
|
#
|
|
# $Id: subquery.test,v 1.14 2006/01/17 09:35:02 danielk1977 Exp $
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
|
|
source $testdir/tester.tcl
|
|
|
|
ifcapable !subquery {
|
|
finish_test
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
do_test subquery-1.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
BEGIN;
|
|
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2);
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3,4);
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5,6);
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(7,8);
|
|
CREATE TABLE t2(x,y);
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1,1);
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3,9);
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(5,25);
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(7,49);
|
|
COMMIT;
|
|
}
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT a, (SELECT y FROM t2 WHERE x=a) FROM t1 WHERE b<8
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 1 3 9 5 25}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.2 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
UPDATE t1 SET b=b+(SELECT y FROM t2 WHERE x=a);
|
|
SELECT * FROM t1;
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 3 3 13 5 31 7 57}
|
|
|
|
do_test subquery-1.3 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE y=a)
|
|
}
|
|
} {3}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.4 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE y=a)
|
|
}
|
|
} {13 31 57}
|
|
|
|
# Simple tests to make sure correlated subqueries in WHERE clauses
|
|
# are used by the query optimizer correctly.
|
|
do_test subquery-1.5 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT a, x FROM t1, t2 WHERE t1.a = (SELECT x);
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 1 3 3 5 5 7 7}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.6 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a);
|
|
SELECT a, x FROM t1, t2 WHERE t1.a = (SELECT x);
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 1 3 3 5 5 7 7}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.7 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT a, x FROM t2, t1 WHERE t1.a = (SELECT x);
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 1 3 3 5 5 7 7}
|
|
|
|
# Try an aggregate in both the subquery and the parent query.
|
|
do_test subquery-1.8 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT count(*) FROM t1 WHERE a > (SELECT count(*) FROM t2);
|
|
}
|
|
} {2}
|
|
|
|
# Test a correlated subquery disables the "only open the index" optimization.
|
|
do_test subquery-1.9.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT (y*2)>b FROM t1, t2 WHERE a=x;
|
|
}
|
|
} {0 1 1 1}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.9.2 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE (SELECT (y*2)>b FROM t2 WHERE a=x);
|
|
}
|
|
} {3 5 7}
|
|
|
|
# Test that the flattening optimization works with subquery expressions.
|
|
do_test subquery-1.10.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT (SELECT a), b FROM t1;
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 3 3 13 5 31 7 57}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.10.2 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT * FROM (SELECT (SELECT a), b FROM t1);
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 3 3 13 5 31 7 57}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.10.3 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT * FROM (SELECT (SELECT sum(a) FROM t1));
|
|
}
|
|
} {16}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.10.4 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t5 (val int, period text PRIMARY KEY);
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(5, '2001-3');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(10, '2001-4');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(15, '2002-1');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(5, '2002-2');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(10, '2002-3');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(15, '2002-4');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(10, '2003-1');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(5, '2003-2');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(25, '2003-3');
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(5, '2003-4');
|
|
|
|
SELECT "a.period", vsum
|
|
FROM (SELECT
|
|
a.period,
|
|
(select sum(val) from t5 where period between a.period and '2002-4') vsum
|
|
FROM t5 a where a.period between '2002-1' and '2002-4')
|
|
WHERE vsum < 45 ;
|
|
}
|
|
} {2002-2 30 2002-3 25 2002-4 15}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.10.5 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT "a.period", vsum from
|
|
(select a.period,
|
|
(select sum(val) from t5 where period between a.period and '2002-4') vsum
|
|
FROM t5 a where a.period between '2002-1' and '2002-4')
|
|
WHERE vsum < 45 ;
|
|
}
|
|
} {2002-2 30 2002-3 25 2002-4 15}
|
|
do_test subquery-1.10.6 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
DROP TABLE t5;
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# The following test cases - subquery-2.* - are not logically
|
|
# organized. They're here largely because they were failing during
|
|
# one stage of development of sub-queries.
|
|
#
|
|
do_test subquery-2.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT (SELECT 10);
|
|
}
|
|
} {10}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.2.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t3(a PRIMARY KEY, b);
|
|
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 2);
|
|
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(3, 1);
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.2.2 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE a IN (SELECT b FROM t3);
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 2}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.2.3 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
DROP TABLE t3;
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.3.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t3(a TEXT);
|
|
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('10');
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.3.2 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT a IN (10.0, 20) FROM t3;
|
|
}
|
|
} {0}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.3.3 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
DROP TABLE t3;
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.4.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t3(a TEXT);
|
|
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('XX');
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.4.2 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT count(*) FROM t3 WHERE a IN (SELECT 'XX')
|
|
}
|
|
} {1}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.4.3 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
DROP TABLE t3;
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.5.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t3(a INTEGER);
|
|
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(10);
|
|
|
|
CREATE TABLE t4(x TEXT);
|
|
INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('10.0');
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.5.2 {
|
|
# In the expr "x IN (SELECT a FROM t3)" the RHS of the IN operator
|
|
# has text affinity and the LHS has integer affinity. The rule is
|
|
# that we try to convert both sides to an integer before doing the
|
|
# comparision. Hence, the integer value 10 in t3 will compare equal
|
|
# to the string value '10.0' in t4 because the t4 value will be
|
|
# converted into an integer.
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT * FROM t4 WHERE x IN (SELECT a FROM t3);
|
|
}
|
|
} {10.0}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.5.3.1 {
|
|
# The t4i index cannot be used to resolve the "x IN (...)" constraint
|
|
# because the constraint has integer affinity but t4i has text affinity.
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE INDEX t4i ON t4(x);
|
|
SELECT * FROM t4 WHERE x IN (SELECT a FROM t3);
|
|
}
|
|
} {10.0}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.5.3.2 {
|
|
# Verify that the t4i index was not used in the previous query
|
|
set ::sqlite_query_plan
|
|
} {t4 {}}
|
|
do_test subquery-2.5.4 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
DROP TABLE t3;
|
|
DROP TABLE t4;
|
|
}
|
|
} {}
|
|
|
|
#------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# The following test cases - subquery-3.* - test tickets that
|
|
# were raised during development of correlated subqueries.
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Ticket 1083
|
|
ifcapable view {
|
|
do_test subquery-3.1 {
|
|
catchsql { DROP TABLE t1; }
|
|
catchsql { DROP TABLE t2; }
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2);
|
|
CREATE VIEW v1 AS SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a>0;
|
|
CREATE TABLE t2(p,q);
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,9);
|
|
SELECT * FROM v1 WHERE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM t2 WHERE p=v1.b);
|
|
}
|
|
} {2}
|
|
} else {
|
|
catchsql { DROP TABLE t1; }
|
|
catchsql { DROP TABLE t2; }
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2);
|
|
CREATE TABLE t2(p,q);
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,9);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# Ticket 1084
|
|
do_test subquery-3.2 {
|
|
catchsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b);
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,2);
|
|
}
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT (SELECT t1.a) FROM t1;
|
|
}
|
|
} {1}
|
|
|
|
# Test Cases subquery-3.3.* test correlated subqueries where the
|
|
# parent query is an aggregate query. Ticket #1105 is an example
|
|
# of such a query.
|
|
#
|
|
do_test subquery-3.3.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT a, (SELECT b) FROM t1 GROUP BY a;
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 2}
|
|
do_test subquery-3.3.2 {
|
|
catchsql {DROP TABLE t2}
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t2(c, d);
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 'one');
|
|
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 'two');
|
|
SELECT a, (SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a=c) FROM t1 GROUP BY a;
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 one}
|
|
do_test subquery-3.3.3 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 4);
|
|
SELECT max(a), (SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a=c) FROM t1;
|
|
}
|
|
} {2 two}
|
|
do_test subquery-3.3.4 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT a, (SELECT (SELECT d FROM t2 WHERE a=c)) FROM t1 GROUP BY a;
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 one 2 two}
|
|
do_test subquery-3.3.5 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT a, (SELECT count(*) FROM t2 WHERE a=c) FROM t1;
|
|
}
|
|
} {1 1 2 1}
|
|
|
|
#------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# These tests - subquery-4.* - use the TCL statement cache to try
|
|
# and expose bugs to do with re-using statements that have been
|
|
# passed to sqlite3_reset().
|
|
#
|
|
# One problem was that VDBE memory cells were not being initialised
|
|
# to NULL on the second and subsequent executions.
|
|
#
|
|
do_test subquery-4.1.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT (SELECT a FROM t1);
|
|
}
|
|
} {1}
|
|
do_test subquery-4.2 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
DELETE FROM t1;
|
|
SELECT (SELECT a FROM t1);
|
|
}
|
|
} {{}}
|
|
do_test subquery-4.2.1 {
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t3(a PRIMARY KEY);
|
|
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(10);
|
|
}
|
|
execsql {INSERT INTO t3 VALUES((SELECT max(a) FROM t3)+1)}
|
|
} {}
|
|
do_test subquery-4.2.2 {
|
|
execsql {INSERT INTO t3 VALUES((SELECT max(a) FROM t3)+1)}
|
|
} {}
|
|
|
|
#------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# The subquery-5.* tests make sure string literals in double-quotes
|
|
# are handled efficiently. Double-quote literals are first checked
|
|
# to see if they match any column names. If there is not column name
|
|
# match then those literals are used a string constants. When a
|
|
# double-quoted string appears, we want to make sure that the search
|
|
# for a matching column name did not cause an otherwise static subquery
|
|
# to become a dynamic (correlated) subquery.
|
|
#
|
|
do_test subquery-5.1 {
|
|
proc callcntproc {n} {
|
|
incr ::callcnt
|
|
return $n
|
|
}
|
|
set callcnt 0
|
|
db function callcnt callcntproc
|
|
execsql {
|
|
CREATE TABLE t4(x,y);
|
|
INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('one',1);
|
|
INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('two',2);
|
|
INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('three',3);
|
|
INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('four',4);
|
|
CREATE TABLE t5(a,b);
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(1,11);
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(2,22);
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(3,33);
|
|
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(4,44);
|
|
SELECT b FROM t5 WHERE a IN
|
|
(SELECT callcnt(y)+0 FROM t4 WHERE x="two")
|
|
}
|
|
} {22}
|
|
do_test subquery-5.2 {
|
|
# This is the key test. The subquery should have only run once. If
|
|
# The double-quoted identifier "two" were causing the subquery to be
|
|
# processed as a correlated subquery, then it would have run 4 times.
|
|
set callcnt
|
|
} {1}
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Ticket #1380. Make sure correlated subqueries on an IN clause work
|
|
# correctly when the left-hand side of the IN operator is constant.
|
|
#
|
|
do_test subquery-6.1 {
|
|
set callcnt 0
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT x FROM t4 WHERE 1 IN (SELECT callcnt(count(*)) FROM t5 WHERE a=y)
|
|
}
|
|
} {one two three four}
|
|
do_test subquery-6.2 {
|
|
set callcnt
|
|
} {4}
|
|
do_test subquery-6.3 {
|
|
set callcnt 0
|
|
execsql {
|
|
SELECT x FROM t4 WHERE 1 IN (SELECT callcnt(count(*)) FROM t5 WHERE a=1)
|
|
}
|
|
} {one two three four}
|
|
do_test subquery-6.4 {
|
|
set callcnt
|
|
} {1}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
finish_test
|